New posts almost every day on the Daily Banter. Please check it out.
Tag Archives: hillary clinton
Little Cheddar Jameson stands with Huma Abedin
This started as a bit of an inside joke I had with myself. I am away for the summer and was looking at a photo of my cat, whose full name has been changed from “Cheddar Jameson” to “Little Cheddar Jameson.”
It refers, of course, to the Facebook group started to support current State Department official and aide to Secretary Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin. Why does she need this support? Because the always grounded in reality Congresswoman Michele Bachmann has accused her of being under the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood. While Little Cheddar Jameson is a cat and has never met Abedin (I have, I worked with her when I did advance for the Clintons), he would stand with her. Even a cat can see how implausible this line of reasoning is.
And this isn’t Alyson “the liberal Democrat” talking. This is Alyson “the I have a brain and can look at things rationally” talking. Senator John McCain has said the same thing as had Speaker of the House John Boehner.
Hillary’s not so secret weapon.
Hillary’s back to her old theme of Stand by Your Man and gets support from some unlikely places.
This week, Senator Hillary Clinton came out and said that a vote for her is a vote to ratify her decision to stay with her husband through the problems and embarrassment he caused her. Politically, it helps her as many who disliked her prior to her show of loyalty during the Lewinsky scandal, a lot of these same people reacted the same way when she did the same thing during the 1992 campaign when the couple appeared on TV to explain how their marriage had weathered problems before and their love for each other and a lot of work had gotten them through it. Sure, speculation runs rampant around this union – is it a marriage of convenience? Is it a political union only? My only question is, why is it anyone’s business?
It is easy to understand why Hillary is doing this. There are people for whom Hillary represents a lot that they do not like but when she remained loyal to her husband, they were impressed and it seems her recent statement will only help her widen her lead in the national polls. With most of the primaries and caucuses around the corner, it is not a bad time to get a bump in that area.
This also brings up what I like to call the “F you factor.” With the longest presidential campaign cycle in history, politicians, pundits and pollsters have all combed through almost all factors that will determine who get the support from voters but they are overlooking this unusual but key factor. What is it? Many women of all political stripes and parties feel when Hillary is attacked for being a woman or for anything she has done in her personal life – remember she did not have the affair that led to the impeachment hearings, it offends a lot of people. One friend reported to me that a friend of hers said something very interesting. They live in a very conservative area in the south, a place where I would not expect to find many Hillary supporters but they are there. The friend said that all the talk about how women are not capable of running the country or that they would not be able to make the decisions a Commander in Chief needs to make and all that talk combined with comments about her hair or what she chooses to wear makes this women want to say “F&@% you! I am voting for Hillary. And she plans to vote that way, which will be the first time she will ever cast her vote for a Democrat. All of her female friends plan to do the same thing.
People talk about taking this or that group for granted and in a time when most pundits said the ‘soccer moms’ has turned into ‘security moms.’ The assumption continues by using that to give the reasons these women will always vote for Republican presidential candidates who will keep them and their families safer. That assumption has lost all credibility now. Rudy Giuliani remains a front runner due to his actions on 9/11 because the world has not changed but our view of it and our place in it has. Even I was comforted by his words that day but even women who may vote on one or two issues may turn to Hillary because of the sense that when she is attacked so are they. If I can see this, all the GOP candidates must at the very least have consultants who should tell them that whenever she is attacked her positives go up. In 2000 her campaign and a debate against Congressman Rick Lazio got a bit boost when he approached her during one of their debates. He walked over to her podium and asked her a very pointed question. Hillary’s polls numbers spiked because he seemed to be attacking her physically and people weren’t comfortable. It’s a funny thing, she is a woman and as much as we like to think sexism is dying and chivalry is long dead, it was a defining moment. In the spirit of full disclosure, Lazio’s campaign was just awful. He was in so far over his head that is was almost painful to watch.
Personally, I think the ‘F-you’ factor is a great thing. I feel like women are finally benefiting from the years of discrimination we have endured. I am glad people are offended when Hillary is attacked for being a woman. Oh and one last note,
Happy Birthday Senator!
